Gary Illyes and Weizi Wang from Google composed “were introducing a new robotics tag, indexifembedded, that brings you more control over when your material is indexed. With the indexifembedded tag, you can tell Google you d still like your content indexed when its embedded through iframes and similar HTML tags in other pages, even when the material page has the noindex tag.”In short, lets state I embed a piece of content using an iframe or some type of code embed method. That piece of material typically, if it is media, has an instruction to be noindexed, but when I embed it on my page that has more context around what I am embedding, it may inform Google that considering that the embedded content is noindexed, do not index the page I am embedding it on. Here, Google is giving you more control to say, index the page the embed is on in spite of what the embed page says. It reminds me of Googles alerting around embedding Instagram or other images and the SEO issues that can cause. Google said that the indexifembedded tag “addresses a common issue that particularly impacts media publishers: while they might desire their content indexed when its embedded on third-party pages, they dont necessarily desire their media pages indexed by themselves. Because they dont want the media pages indexed, they currently use a noindex tag in such pages. The noindex tag likewise prevents embedding the content in other pages during indexing.”The new robotics tag, indexifembedded, Google stated “operate in combination with the noindex tag just when the page with noindex is embedded into another page through an iframe or similar HTML tag, like item.”The example Google offered was with a podcast, if podcast.host.example/ playpage?podcast=12345 has both the noindex and indexifembedded tag, it indicates Google can embed the content hosted on that page in recipe.site.example/ my-recipes. html during indexing. I presume the exact same would use to Instagram and other embeds.So if Instagram would execute this brand-new indexifembedded it might resolve that problem, maybe?Here are the code examples both in meta robots and x-robots type: I did ask Google for a bit more information: I read it as managing indexing the embedded page, not the page embedding it on– Pascal Birchler (@swissspidy) January 21, 2022 I simply dont see why Instagram would care to execute this – why do they care how embedding their content on my site effects if my pages are indexed? They desire the traffic straight, they do not desire me to rank above them.A “common” (its brand-new, so theres nothing typical yet:-RRB-)use-case would be widgets or ingrained content, where you have a special URL for the embed that you do not want indexed, however you still desire to permit the embedding page to utilize it for indexing. Eg, video embeds.– & #x 1f404; John & #x 1f404; (@JohnMu) January 21, 2022 Forum discussion at Twitter.

With the indexifembedded tag, you can inform Google you d still like your content indexed when its embedded through iframes and similar HTML tags in other pages, even when the content page has the noindex tag.”The brand-new robots tag, indexifembedded, Google stated “works in combination with the noindex tag just when the page with noindex is embedded into another page through an iframe or similar HTML tag, like things. I presume the exact same would apply to Instagram and other embeds.So if Instagram would execute this brand-new indexifembedded it might solve that problem, maybe?Here are the code examples both in meta robotics and x-robots kind: I did ask Google for a bit more clarification: I read it as controlling indexing the embedded page, not the page embedding it on– Pascal Birchler (@swissspidy) January 21, 2022 I just do not see why Instagram would care to execute this – why do they care how embedding their content on my site impacts if my pages are indexed?

It lets you manage if you desire Google to index a page with embedded content. This allows Google to index the content of a page if its embedded in another page through iframes or comparable HTML tags, in spite of a noindex instruction.

site-tuning