In brief, the claims from Attorney General Paxton stated that Google throttled non-AMP pages and used different techniques to promote its own ad organization and much more.Here is a bit from the post: Newly unredacted grievances against Google declare that the search giants Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP), which the company claimed would “significantly enhance” mobile web performance when it released in 2015, was in fact a scheme to push publishers into using the format in order to limit marketing dollars not invested on its own advertisement exchanges.The complaint, which is led by the State of Texas on behalf of 16 mainly Republican states, goes so far as to declare Google even throttled the load speed of pages not using AMP in order to offer a “nice comparative increase” to AMP. Here are some tweets: All those years, all those Googlers, devs, & & SEOs defending AMP … And this is simply the pointer of the iceberg.I simply wish journalist @dannysullivan (before Google bought him off) was here to excoriate them for these horrible actions. I want to read these internal Google files and see if what his claims are, are legitimate accurate without a doubt from those documents.And I waited, so the other day afternoon, Google sent us this statement:”Just due to the fact that Attorney General Paxton asserts something doesnt make it true. – Google spokespersonGoogle likewise referenced its old blog post “AG Paxtons claims about AMP and header bidding are simply false. Engineers at Google developed AMP in collaboration with publishers and other tech business to help websites load quicker and enhance the user experience on mobile gadgets– not to damage header bidding.

In brief, the claims from Attorney General Paxton said that Google throttled non-AMP pages and used different techniques to promote its own advertisement service and much more.Here is a snippet from the post: Newly unredacted grievances versus Google allege that the search giants Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP), which the company claimed would “significantly enhance” mobile web performance when it released in 2015, was in truth a plan to push publishers into using the format in order to limit advertising dollars not invested on its own ad exchanges.The complaint, which is led by the State of Texas on behalf of 16 primarily Republican states, goes so far as to declare Google even throttled the load speed of pages not utilizing AMP in order to offer a “nice comparative boost” to AMP. I desire to read these internal Google documents and see if what his claims are, are legitimate factual without a doubt from those documents.And I waited, so yesterday afternoon, Google sent us this statement:”Just due to the fact that Attorney General Paxton asserts something does not make it true. – Google spokespersonGoogle likewise referenced its old blog post “AG Paxtons claims about AMP and header bidding are simply false.

site-tuning