He stated it may lead Google to automating the elimination of those rich results for those sites.He said structured data for rich outcomes, including dish listicles, ought to not be used on list pages. There are lots of listicle type posts pages being marked up as dishes and have actually handled to rank on a recipe carousel, for example if you search for simple dinner ideas, you will see what I mean.Answer: I took a look at some of those outcomes and that appears like something that we should not be revealing rich outcomes for. In particular in the rich outcomes guidelines we do have that it needs to be just one product on the page and it shouldnt be like a list of dishes for you to utilize the dish markup.
Googles John Mueller said in Fridays video that he reviewed a bunch of recipe related questions and notifications a nice variety of sites using rich results markup improperly. He said it may lead Google to automating the elimination of those abundant results for those sites.He said structured data for rich results, consisting of recipe listicles, need to not be utilized on list pages. He stated “it needs to be simply one item on the page and it should not resemble a list of dishes for you to use the dish markup.” John said that based upon the questions given up the example concern “theyre just a great deal of sites that are doing this.” He said “I believe the smarter approach would be on our side to see if we can algorithmically acknowledge this and kind of just not reveal those abundant results for those kind of pages. Instead of manually attempting to chase everyone down, find a way to do that in a more scalable method.”So possibly, simply perhaps, in the nearish future, you might see a lot of these dish sites lose a few of their abundant results.This came up at the 8:20 mark into the video. Concern: Is structured data charge a thing and enforced? There are many listicle type articles pages being increased as recipes and have handled to rank on a dish carousel, for example if you search for simple supper ideas, you will see what I mean.Answer: I had a look at some of those results which appears like something that we shouldnt be showing rich outcomes for. In particular in the rich outcomes standards we do have that it must be simply one product on the page and it should not be like a list of recipes for you to use the dish markup. On the one hand thats something where I believe we might possibly take manual action with the webspam group on that. When we take manual action on rich outcomes generally that suggests we would just disappoint the abundant results for those sites. Because at least the examples that you offered there appear like something where theyre simply a lot of websites that are doing this, I believe the smarter approach would be on our side to see if we can algorithmically recognize this and kind of simply not reveal those abundant outcomes for those kind of pages. So rather of by hand attempting to go after everyone down, find a way to do that in a more scalable way.Glenn Gabe spotted this: Using dish markup for short articles or listicles & & appearing in the recipe carousel? -> > Via @johnmu: Thats not something we should be showing abundant results for. It might lead to a manual action, but may be smarter for Google to handle algorithmically: https://t.co/at4xOumxLe pic.twitter.com/x8G0eWn3Iz— Glenn Gabe (@glenngabe) September 3, 2021 Forum discussion at Twitter.Note: This was pre-written and arranged to be published today, I am presently offline for Rosh Hashanah.