First-party information and zero-party data are similar. The key difference comes down to offering data vs. collecting information.
With zero-party data, the individual is actively offering specific details, like their choices, rather than just consenting to their information being collected after the reality. As ad tech personal privacy policies like GDPR and CCPA continue to safeguard consumer information, zero-party data ends up being the cream of the crop. Not only does the data evade personal privacy offenses, however zero-party data paints a more accurate picture of the customer due to the fact that it comes straight from them.

“Data-Driven Thinking” is composed by members of the media neighborhood and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.
Todays column is composed by Corey Weiner, CEO of Jun Group.
As the advertisement tech industry moved in the last 5 years towards more privacy-conscious advertising, first-party data ended up being the golden child. The pitch was sweet and short: Why purchase awful, third-party information from a sketchy information aggregator when you can put together fresh, actionable data yourself?
First-party data buzz permeated the discourse in the last couple of years as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) broken down on privacy offenses in recent years, and the tech giants began walling up their gardens with the death of the third-party cookie and Apples Identifier for Advertisers (IDFA).
In 2021, a new term has begun popping up all over the ad tech world: zero-party data, a kind of information that explains an even more direct relationship between brand name and consumer.
What is zero-party data?
Coined by Forrester research study back in July 2020, zero-party information encompasses any information that a consumer offers to a brand or business willingly and purposefully.

This can include a customers personal qualities such as age or gender, a clients purchase intent such as whether theyre in the marketplace for a brand-new car or any other information the consumer is comfortable straight showing the brand. Many survey information, where a customer chooses to tell a brand name about their choices, is a type of zero-party information
You might have experienced this type of information on YouTube, where a survey appears prior to your video, asking you to choose your age. The study is entirely opt-in and plainly identified as such; if you dont respond to, YouTube doesnt get your response, easy as that. Other examples consist of Yelp, who recently started asking users in advance about their dining preferences, and Tide, whos discovered success crafting gamified experiences that have users input their preferred types of detergents.
If zero-party data includes all consumer information thats directly offered to brand names, what does that make first-party data?
First-party data vs. zero-party data.
First-party information and zero-party information are similar. Theyre both (preferably) consent-based, as in the person whose information is being gathered knows its being collected. The essential distinction boils down to volunteering information vs. gathering data.
First-party data includes a persons online behavior, such as what they click, how quickly they click, where they hover, how far they scroll, and the length of time they invest in a website. First-party information was fantastic in the 2010s– it showed brand names how people en masse behaved with their ads and products.
With zero-party information, the person is actively offering specific details, like their choices, rather than simply consenting to their information being collected after the reality. Theyre both consent-based, but zero-party data comes straight from the consumer to the brand name, producing a stronger and more trusted relationship.
Why utilize zero-party data?
As ad tech personal privacy guidelines like GDPR and CCPA continue to secure consumer information, zero-party data ends up being the cream of the crop. Not only does the data evade personal privacy infractions, however zero-party information paints a more accurate image of the consumer because it comes straight from them.
The only obstacle brand names face with zero-party information is getting consumers to actively get in into a discussion with the brand. Its really tempting to skip a study, particularly if I get nothing in return for supplying my choices.
Thats why the most successful brand names weave their studies into the value-exchange design, which provides consumers a reward in return for sharing information, like an additional life in an app, complimentary Wi-Fi at an airport or 30 minutes of ad-free listening on Spotify.
Youve probably heard of value-exchange advertisements, which reward the customer for seeing an ad. The same design uses to zero-party information collection: Tell a brand name your choices (e.g., whether you buy natural ingredients) and get something back in return. This ensures the brand is effectively rewarding the consumer for submitting a survey or offering their details.
The most successful brand names will make it simple and even rewarding for customers to voluntarily provide their information in a consent-based way. In return, consumers who take part in providing zero-party information will get tailored ad experiences without worries of brands tracking their habits behind the scenes. Zero-party data will lead the way for brands to target consumers in a genuine, transparent way.
Follow (@JunGroup) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.