High CPAs.

If youre running CPM campaigns as youre being charged even if no clicks take place, this experiment gets a little hairier. Because instance, youll need to ask yourself if the impressions deserve the invest even if no one is engaging with your site..

What criteria do you utilize to review placements? We d like to hear your suggestions in the remarks listed below!.

Have a look at the positionings that are transforming at the least expensive CPAs. Are they suspiciously low or is it simply lower than average? Check out the site itself and ensure its content suggests a much better CPA, especially if conversion volume is fairly high..

A quick coming down sort of your CPCs column will reveal you where youre paying the highest total up to appear. Vet these placements. If theyre not offering you a strong factor to stay, then they got ta go.

As we go through each of these efficiency filters, there are 2 crucial things Im searching for: underperformance and unrealistic metrics..

Merely filter your report for 0 conversions, then do descending spend and leave out all of those with so much spend that even if they converted on the next click, you d be disappointed with the CPA..

Normally, I provide a little bit of leniency and let spend of 1.5 x to 2x the CPA objective slide, but you can set your own constraints..

Low CPAs always seem like a great thing? However often, much like high CTRs, they can be a sign of questionable activity..

That said, much like with high expense, no conversions, its worth providing some versatility on private placements. At a project level you might be hitting your goals, but within that, you might discover some positionings with CPAs well below and others well above your target. Having this variety on this granular level will enable you to scale, but there is a snapping point..

CTR is an essential metric to understand whether your advertisements are resonating with your target audience or not. CTRs on the GDN are almost constantly going to be lower than Search (unless youre doing a especially excellent or bad task depending on the network), but one thing that always stands out to me are sites with abnormally high CTRs. Particularly, those over 100%..

If you think the material may be appropriate adequate however still question the conversions, possibly try including a positioning parameter to the end of your URLs so you can track lead quality or profits in your CRMs. Then you can let the information speak for itself whether you should keep leveraging a placement or not..

Reviewing a lot of placements can truthfully be a substantial headache, but with a tactical plan, you can at least get the huge concerns out of the way a bit quicker. Ideally between the content and this post focused piece youll conserve yourself some management hours in addition to improve efficiency.

Lets close out by looking at conversion performance..

You can quickly filter your report for CTRs over 100%, provide a fast scan, then exclude as you please..

High Cost, No Conversions:.

Numerous of the websites that wind up with 150% or 200% CTRs usually have low volume, but Ive also found that for whatever reason, a number of them are likewise lower quality sites..

The simplest method to find these statistics is to filter for Conversions > > 0 and after that do the sorts similar to weve done for other views above..

Descending Conversions:.

CTR over 100%:.

My general rule is usually 2x my target CPA for individual positionings, but just if others are also transforming and offsetting. Based on your specific account efficiency, you might need to set a different standard that makes more sense..

I normally like to do a thought experiment like this: If this site gets one click on its next impression, is the CTR appropriate or still unbearably low?.

Often it can be great to have your ads running on lots of sites and seeing few clicks. Perhaps, if its the right website content and the right audience, you should still see branding advantages. CTRs on the GDN are almost constantly going to be lower than Search (unless youre doing a particularly great or bad task depending on the network), however one thing that constantly stands out to me are sites with abnormally high CTRs. At times, there can be some websites that are extremely competitive that cause you to pay very high CPCs. Are there any websites I can leverage even more?

Based upon the results, I like to look at a couple of various things:.


Among the advantages of Display campaigns is that they typically have lower CPCs than other targeting options. At times, there can be some websites that are highly competitive that cause you to pay really high CPCs. Unless these websites are providing results or are such a best suitable for your audience that theyre worth it, these can be budget eaters that arent providing much value..

Descending CPCs:.

In practically every case, youre running Google Display projects to get some sort of efficiency from them. Extremely few people run projects simply for the sake of running them and gaining impressions. Nearly all of my accounts are concentrated on conversion actions from the GDN, even if those actions are more top of the funnel..

Start by filtering your report for any positioning with Clicks = 0 and then arrange the websites descending by Impression count..

How extensive are conversions? Are they coming primarily from a couple of sites or are they pretty uniformly spaced out? Do the websites that are producing conversions look pertinent? Are the transforming websites of reasonable quality? Are there any sites I can take advantage of even more? Contribute to a positioning campaign, usage for Custom Intent Audiences, and so on? Depending on what you find in your leading converting sites, there are lots of ways you can take advantage of those insights to either grow the success of your campaign, reduce lower quality leads, or broaden display screen techniques in other campaigns..

This one is probably pretty self explanatory. If were trying to drive conversion efficiency from our Display campaigns, then placements with high invest and 0 conversions need to be a pretty simple one to leave out..

Finally, were going to take a look at which sites are converting for the highest and lowest CPA, despite volume..

Sometimes it can be fantastic to have your advertisements running on great deals of sites and seeing couple of clicks. Perhaps, if its the ideal site material and the ideal audience, you ought to still see branding benefits. Odds are if youre not seeing any clicks, its likely a bad match..

Transforming Sites, Ascending & & Descending CPA:.

In my last post, I discussed how to evaluate the content of the placements and evaluate if theyre an excellent suitable for your account. In this post, Im going to focus on the performance from each of the placements our advertisements have operated on..

Here they are, in no specific order..

This one is relatively self explanatory. If positionings are transforming at a CPA much higher than your objective, its likely a good one to omit..

High Impressions, No Clicks:.

Low CPAs.

Depending upon the volume of impressions you typically see with your campaigns, a high count here could be in the thousands or tens of thousands..


This is the 2nd in a two-part series on how to review automatic placement reports for Google Show Network campaigns..

Depending upon the response to that concern (and the material match for the site), I can pick to include websites acquiring impressions as negatives or keep them running..

Comparable to looking for high impression positionings, I constantly like to have a look at the sites that are driving the highest number of conversions. Its a quite easy filter in the report to include all rows and sort by coming down conversions..